sri1234
01-30 08:47 AM
You can work on H1B visa till you get FINAL approval or denial.
Whats your attorney openion?
I do not have direct contact with the attorney.
My company hr says i can work as per the attorney.
I am wondering will this have any effect on my I-485?
Can i apply for H1 transfer during this period?
Please advise.
Whats your attorney openion?
I do not have direct contact with the attorney.
My company hr says i can work as per the attorney.
I am wondering will this have any effect on my I-485?
Can i apply for H1 transfer during this period?
Please advise.
wallpaper Twilight star Kristen Stewart
123456mg
08-16 08:06 PM
I applied for my PERM Labor Certification on 06-Aug-2007. My status online shows "APPROVED"on 13-Aug-2007. My Lawyer says that the HARD COPY is needed to move forward (My priority date is Jan-2006 from a prior Labor/I-140 approval).
1. How long does it usually take for the Hard copy to reach the attorney's office after approval.
2. Is there any way I can apply for I-140/485 by August 17th given that my status shows "APPROVED" as of today (August 14th).
Any suggestions?
This is another classical case of attorney screw up. If only your attorney had filed 6 days earlier, you could have filed for your I-140 and I-485 concurrently.
1. How long does it usually take for the Hard copy to reach the attorney's office after approval.
2. Is there any way I can apply for I-140/485 by August 17th given that my status shows "APPROVED" as of today (August 14th).
Any suggestions?
This is another classical case of attorney screw up. If only your attorney had filed 6 days earlier, you could have filed for your I-140 and I-485 concurrently.
Blog Feeds
12-20 08:00 AM
On Saturday morning, the Senate failed to advance the DREAM Act (H.R. 5281) on a vote of 55-41. Sixty votes were needed to move the bill forward procedurally and stop any filibuster. With that loss, the fight for the DREAM Act is over, at least for this Congress. Below is a summary of Greg Chen's report of this vote.
The vote tally in support of DREAM included three Republicans who crossed the aisle to join 50 Democrats and 2 Independents. Those three Rs were: Richard Lugar (IN) and Robert Bennett (UT) who had come out in support long ago and Lisa Murkowski (AK) who started signaling this week that she would vote �yes�. With their yes votes, DREAM maintained its status as a bi-partisan bill back nine years to when it was first introduced with seven Republican co-sponsors. Today, long-time DREAM champion Orrin Hatch (R-UT) failed even to show for the bill he originally sponsored in August 2001.
Unfortunately the gain of three Republicans today was not enough to make up the difference. Combined there are 58 Democrats and Independents in the Senate, and there are 42 Republicans. If all the Ds and Is voted in favor, only two Rs would have been needed to reach 60. But today 5 Democrats voted against DREAM: Baucus (MT); Hagan (NC); Nelson (NE); Pryor (AR); and Tester (MT). And one Democrat, newly elected Joe Manchin (WV) failed to show. To win on �cloture� 60 votes were needed no matter how many actually voted. Thus, a no-show counted as a �no� vote.
As the 111th Congress comes to its sputtering halt, at least on immigration, the question many are asking is whether there will be a real opportunity to bring up DREAM in the 112th. Looking forward, we face at least two enormous legislative challenges: First, the House will shift to Republican control with 242 Rs and 193 Ds. Last week the House passed DREAM on a 218-198 vote�you can bet your house we won�t muster a strong showing like that, let alone a majority, when the new session starts. Second, in the Senate, the Democrats will still have the majority but their margin of control will be 53-47 so getting the �yes� votes will also be harder in that chamber.
For many of us the source of continued inspiration has been to see all the DREAM activists walking the halls of the capitol and showing tremendous courage when they are the ones who have everything at risk. Let's keep a positive spirit for the future as the fight is not over yet.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/12/senate_fails_to_pass_dream_act.html)
The vote tally in support of DREAM included three Republicans who crossed the aisle to join 50 Democrats and 2 Independents. Those three Rs were: Richard Lugar (IN) and Robert Bennett (UT) who had come out in support long ago and Lisa Murkowski (AK) who started signaling this week that she would vote �yes�. With their yes votes, DREAM maintained its status as a bi-partisan bill back nine years to when it was first introduced with seven Republican co-sponsors. Today, long-time DREAM champion Orrin Hatch (R-UT) failed even to show for the bill he originally sponsored in August 2001.
Unfortunately the gain of three Republicans today was not enough to make up the difference. Combined there are 58 Democrats and Independents in the Senate, and there are 42 Republicans. If all the Ds and Is voted in favor, only two Rs would have been needed to reach 60. But today 5 Democrats voted against DREAM: Baucus (MT); Hagan (NC); Nelson (NE); Pryor (AR); and Tester (MT). And one Democrat, newly elected Joe Manchin (WV) failed to show. To win on �cloture� 60 votes were needed no matter how many actually voted. Thus, a no-show counted as a �no� vote.
As the 111th Congress comes to its sputtering halt, at least on immigration, the question many are asking is whether there will be a real opportunity to bring up DREAM in the 112th. Looking forward, we face at least two enormous legislative challenges: First, the House will shift to Republican control with 242 Rs and 193 Ds. Last week the House passed DREAM on a 218-198 vote�you can bet your house we won�t muster a strong showing like that, let alone a majority, when the new session starts. Second, in the Senate, the Democrats will still have the majority but their margin of control will be 53-47 so getting the �yes� votes will also be harder in that chamber.
For many of us the source of continued inspiration has been to see all the DREAM activists walking the halls of the capitol and showing tremendous courage when they are the ones who have everything at risk. Let's keep a positive spirit for the future as the fight is not over yet.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/12/senate_fails_to_pass_dream_act.html)
2011 Kristen Stewart#39;s new auburn
cox
February 11th, 2005, 11:41 PM
Well, my eye is initially drawn from top left to bottom right, and then there's nothing to see there. The colors are great, and the exposure is good. It's great when you get the sun's disk just so, and the clouds are really nicely lit... But I have to say the composition doesn't work with the sun down there in the corner, IMHO.
more...
jessy-james
03-26 03:44 PM
I have got my EAD, and my application was filed in EB3, 2005 in perm.
With the kind of speed USCIS is working with, I fear I would never get my GC.
Whereas My brother is a Citizen. Can it be possible that he files family based GC for me ?
I have read that for family based applications they regard the priority date as date of filing I-130.
If I do so, will my current process be wiped off ?
what are the repurcussions.
Please advice.
With the kind of speed USCIS is working with, I fear I would never get my GC.
Whereas My brother is a Citizen. Can it be possible that he files family based GC for me ?
I have read that for family based applications they regard the priority date as date of filing I-130.
If I do so, will my current process be wiped off ?
what are the repurcussions.
Please advice.
arnet
06-13 08:46 PM
check with your attroney, in general you can do concurrent I-485 filing along with I-140 (or) if your I-140 pending you can still apply for I-485 with I-140 filing. But I never did this, so check with your attroney now and do it. good luck
Congrats to all who can apply for I 485.oUR situation is that my husband is a fellow in medicine speciality and already been offered a job which he wil start in july 2008.Our details
lc approved for the future job
i 140 pending.
Are we eligible to apply for i 485 ..ead for a future job etc.
I am on h4 .
Thanks People.
Thanks to iv
Congrats to all who can apply for I 485.oUR situation is that my husband is a fellow in medicine speciality and already been offered a job which he wil start in july 2008.Our details
lc approved for the future job
i 140 pending.
Are we eligible to apply for i 485 ..ead for a future job etc.
I am on h4 .
Thanks People.
Thanks to iv
more...
scorpionk
05-17 08:24 AM
Your first part of the question, so if I find an employer in Canada, then can I work for that company in the US without loosing the PR dates ? Are there are any complications to this ?
What about the spouse and children, can they stay in the US too or do they have to stay in Canada ?
Is the PR years counted only for the principal applicant or for all applicants?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
What about the spouse and children, can they stay in the US too or do they have to stay in Canada ?
Is the PR years counted only for the principal applicant or for all applicants?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
2010 kristen stewart hairstyle
panky72
07-25 11:32 AM
Guys,
Are the dates mentioned in this bulletin for new I765 applications or renewal applications?
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
Both for new and renewals
Are the dates mentioned in this bulletin for new I765 applications or renewal applications?
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
Both for new and renewals
more...
krish2006
04-19 11:51 AM
Is it possible to extend H4 status after using EAD for a person whose I-485 pending in derivative status.
I read Cronin Memo reg. dual intent "Revision of March 14, 2000 Dual Intent Memorandum"
It seems to discuss reg. using AP to enter the country and maintaining H status.
Not sure if anyone here has done the extension of H4 after using EAD.
Cronin memo:
Cronin Memo (5-16-00) | Carl Shusterman (http://shusterman.com/h1blvisasmemoworkingadvanceparole.html)
Appreciate any comments reg. this,
I read Cronin Memo reg. dual intent "Revision of March 14, 2000 Dual Intent Memorandum"
It seems to discuss reg. using AP to enter the country and maintaining H status.
Not sure if anyone here has done the extension of H4 after using EAD.
Cronin memo:
Cronin Memo (5-16-00) | Carl Shusterman (http://shusterman.com/h1blvisasmemoworkingadvanceparole.html)
Appreciate any comments reg. this,
hair See some of Kristin#39;s pre-2010
mailtobalu
07-28 03:36 PM
Hi,
I am presently working on L1B for company A. This year Company B applied for H1B and same is approved received the approved letter with I-94.
Now I would like to continue in my current job with Company A till I find long project (Minimum 6 Months). My question here is can I continue in my current job after OCT 1st in my L1B Status.
If I want to continue in L1B status what should I do? As of I heard if I travel out of the states and reentered in US after OCT2nd on L1B visa I can continue with L1B status. then what happens to my H1B status? Can I directly move to H1B status when I find a project from Company B?
Please let me know how I should proceed to keep L1B and H1B status valid after OCT1st?
I am presently working on L1B for company A. This year Company B applied for H1B and same is approved received the approved letter with I-94.
Now I would like to continue in my current job with Company A till I find long project (Minimum 6 Months). My question here is can I continue in my current job after OCT 1st in my L1B Status.
If I want to continue in L1B status what should I do? As of I heard if I travel out of the states and reentered in US after OCT2nd on L1B visa I can continue with L1B status. then what happens to my H1B status? Can I directly move to H1B status when I find a project from Company B?
Please let me know how I should proceed to keep L1B and H1B status valid after OCT1st?
more...
kartikiran
06-18 01:01 PM
I see a lot of members being more passive.
What we would like to do is, if you an idea we are willing to listen. Before that, we would also like to share in this "Meet & Greet" event what IV has done so far and its accomplishments.
Lot of members proably look at IV as a forum where just threads are being created to discuss their problems.
But IV is not a just a web-site. IV has more out-reaching efforts to resolve the problem of backlog of employment-based green cards.
If you are from Long Island and you feel you would like to do something to resolve this immigration crisis, align yourself in this thread.
I hope more smaller "meet & greet" is the only way to lead ourselves to the "BIG RALLY" / "BIG INTIATIVE" what everyone wants. Without grassroots effort, a RALLY or any other BIG INITIATIVE is not going to happen.
We can only look at EADs for two years or Advance Parole cards come in package with the EAD without grassroot efforts. But if you want to bypass all these smaller incentives and look at the end result of getting your green cards, join your state chapters.
What we would like to do is, if you an idea we are willing to listen. Before that, we would also like to share in this "Meet & Greet" event what IV has done so far and its accomplishments.
Lot of members proably look at IV as a forum where just threads are being created to discuss their problems.
But IV is not a just a web-site. IV has more out-reaching efforts to resolve the problem of backlog of employment-based green cards.
If you are from Long Island and you feel you would like to do something to resolve this immigration crisis, align yourself in this thread.
I hope more smaller "meet & greet" is the only way to lead ourselves to the "BIG RALLY" / "BIG INTIATIVE" what everyone wants. Without grassroots effort, a RALLY or any other BIG INITIATIVE is not going to happen.
We can only look at EADs for two years or Advance Parole cards come in package with the EAD without grassroot efforts. But if you want to bypass all these smaller incentives and look at the end result of getting your green cards, join your state chapters.
hot Hair Model Kristen Stewart
GreenCardLegion
04-20 12:28 AM
You can use your eb3 EAD.
But first to get into EB2 category, you have to first file another separate labor with a different employer (w/same employer it will most likely rejected) and then file 140 separately agian and then once your 140 is approved get it interfiled and then port from eb3 to eb2.
But first to get into EB2 category, you have to first file another separate labor with a different employer (w/same employer it will most likely rejected) and then file 140 separately agian and then once your 140 is approved get it interfiled and then port from eb3 to eb2.
more...
house For Kristen Stewart, a guide
LondonTown
11-21 12:18 AM
Please do not go for stamping if it can be avoided, as embassies are very frequently giving form 221(g) for additional administrative processing which may take few weeks to several months.
tattoo kristen stewart 200906090826
americandesi
04-11 04:20 PM
Guys
So, why is it no organization has tried this? or has this been tried before and failed..
This has been tried before by Rajiv Khanna and it was unsuccessful
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=223206&postcount=111
So, why is it no organization has tried this? or has this been tried before and failed..
This has been tried before by Rajiv Khanna and it was unsuccessful
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=223206&postcount=111
more...
pictures Kristen Stewart Hairstyle
anura
04-28 01:26 PM
On the lighter side,
"Superman renounces his U.S. citizenship
I thought he died because Bush wouldn't authorize embryonic stem cell research. Anyway he is an intergalactic illegal immigrant from Krypton.
"Superman renounces his U.S. citizenship
I thought he died because Bush wouldn't authorize embryonic stem cell research. Anyway he is an intergalactic illegal immigrant from Krypton.
dresses kristen stewart joan jett
new_horizon
04-06 02:08 PM
I think it should be fine as long as the visa page is not tampered or damaged, and the electronic information can be read. Also since she has a new pp, it should not be a problem. She should carry both the old and new pp with her.
more...
makeup Kristen Stewart Hairstyles
godbless
01-10 02:22 PM
Guys:
Any news when this would be out and what to expect..??
Good Luck..
May be on Friday. Usually it is on Fridays only.
Any news when this would be out and what to expect..??
Good Luck..
May be on Friday. Usually it is on Fridays only.
girlfriend Beautiful Kristen Stewart
sunnymit
02-22 11:05 AM
Ok. That makes sense. I will contact the HQ and try to find out the solution. Calling the local SS office doesn't help as the first thing their automated system asks for is SS# for you to move on!
hairstyles Kristen Stewart#39;s Pixie
drirshad
04-07 12:31 PM
April 10th is National Day of Action for Immigrant Justice
Check your local city details below to participate.
http://www.cccaction.org/cccaction/april_10_local_events.html
Check your local city details below to participate.
http://www.cccaction.org/cccaction/april_10_local_events.html
niklshah
09-16 02:52 PM
no u can not work on receipt, try to call USCIs and expedite the process, go to senators office they will help u in this matter also...
martinvisalaw
01-26 10:37 AM
He is out of status if the L-1 employer no longer exists or he is not working for that company. If the position still existed, he would be maintaining status even though the L-1 I-94 has expired, if the extension was filed before the I-94 expired. However, the issue isn't the late filing of the extension, it's the fact that he is not working for the company and really had no basis for filing an extension.
Having the extension pending means that he is not accruing unlawful presence (something that could subject him to a bar from the US), however he needs to rectify his status rather than rely on an inappropriate L-1. If he trusts his immigration lawyer, he should discuss the options with her/him.
Having the extension pending means that he is not accruing unlawful presence (something that could subject him to a bar from the US), however he needs to rectify his status rather than rely on an inappropriate L-1. If he trusts his immigration lawyer, he should discuss the options with her/him.
No comments:
Post a Comment